FOLLOW US ON:
GET THE NEWSLETTER
CONTACT US
Congressional Pandemonium: House GOP almost votes for radical budget!
04.15.2011
04:53 pm
Topics:
Tags:

image
 
Have you seen the footage of House Republicans scrambling to change their votes on the conservative Republican Study Committee budget, yet? If not, press play and watch 30 seconds of complete idiot GOP pandemonium courtesy of House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (MD) who dished this out like a master prankster.

When Hoyer got wind that the Republicans were going to hold a vote on the budget plan, he hatched a scheme to dupe the GOP (who would normally count on Democrats to defeat a bill this extreme) and hang this draconian budget—one even more severe than the one proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan (you know, the one with the REAL death panels)—around their necks. The RSC amendment would have banned earmarks, raised the retirement age and prevented any new tax increases!

It almost worked, as you can see from the not so “candid camera” video below.

Hoyer told Brian Breutler at TPM:

“I thought to myself the Republican leadership is probably thinking we’re going to defeat it for them,” Hoyer told me in a phone interview Friday. “I said to myself I’m not interested in seeing that happen. I want the Republicans to show what they believe. And if a majority of them believe that that’s the kind of budget [they want] the American people need to know that.”

The RSC is a very large bloc of conservative Republican House members. They introduced a 10-year plan for America that makes the already far-reaching House budget look fairly moderate. It was supposed to be a symbolic vote—one that allowed conservative members to go on the record in support of slashing $9 trillion in spending knowing full well it would never be adopted as the official position of the House and the Republican Party. Hoyer figured them out.

“I also knew that if we telegraphed that early, they would obviously try to anticipate it, work their caucus early,” he said. “As a result I did not have a whip meeting on this—I did discuss it with the Leader [Nancy Pelosi], I discussed it with the Democratic leadership. I told them it was my plan. And they were all for that.”

If he’d briefed his caucus on the tactic days ahead of the vote, word might have leaked. So he gave them just about five minutes notice.

“Then today, I had a meeting with my senior whip team, assigned them around the floor, and then just before the vote…we sent out an email to the BlackBerrys of our members saying that a). we want you to vote late, b). we want to vote present,” Hoyer explained. “And then on the floor, my whips explained to members why we were doing that.”

That led to the chaos on the House floor late Friday morning. With almost all Democrats voting present, Republicans realized they were about to accidentally pass a plan that was too politically radioactive even to them. So they pressed several of their own members—including Reps. David Dreier (R-CA), Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Buck McKeon (R-CA), and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA)—to switch their votes from yes to no. Indeed, when they realized what the Dems were up to, Republicans managed to flip just as many votes as they’d need to kill the RSC plan, even if every Democrat voted “present.” Only 15 Democrats declined to switch their votes from “no” to “present.” The plan failed by 16 votes.

“We got a lot of them to change, not every one of them to change,” Hoyer said. Those who didn’t, including several Blue Dogs wouldn’t budge. “There were a variety of reasons. I think some have tough races. Some said they’d never voted present. I was disappointed that they did not follow what I think was a strategy to highlight the position of the Republican Party.”

Now that Republicans are wise to the maneuver, they might think twice before they put symbolic conservative measures on the floor. If they’re not more careful, they’ll fall into the same trap.

“It depends on whether they continue to offer policies that are clearly inconsistent with the American mainstream,” Hoyer reasoned. “If they continue to do that their members are either going to have to decide early that they’re going to have to vote against those policies, or they’re going to be back in that position.”

So good to see the Democrats beating these knuckleheads back at long last. Between this and Obama’s excellent and feisty speech (a speech “worthy of a President, “as E.J. Dionne, Jr. put it in the Washington Post) Obama and the Democrats have really closed my enthusiasm gap this week. I didn’t think that was going to be possible.

Update: The GOP-controlled House has passed the Ryan 2012 budget (which will be DOA in the Senate anyway) with only Republicans voting for it. (Four GOP members voted no and there were zero Democratic votes). These bastards own it now… Read more at Politico.
 

 

Posted by Richard Metzger
|
04.15.2011
04:53 pm
|
Discussion

 

 

comments powered by Disqus